Sign inCompoundsMatrixyl
Layer A — first-party, cited authorityLayer B — disclaimed UGC & research toolsNo first-party human-dosing guidance, ever.
00–01 · 40 · 15

Overview

The single most cited surface

Matrixyl

Research use only

Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 signal peptide that mimics collagen matrikine fragments to stimulate extracellular matrix synthesis in dermal fibroblasts.

Lipidated signal peptide; cosmeceutical matrikine; palmitoyl oligopeptidePalmitoyl Pentapeptide-4
Anti agingWrinkle reductionCollagen synthesisCosmeceuticalSkin appearanceExtracellular matrix
11studies indexed
10sources cited
2026-05-29 last verified
Best verified price / mg
$0.520/mg
across 6 tracked vendors · United States
Median $/mg
$0.902
Studies indexed
11
Evidence maturity
Preclinical · 45/100
Community sentiment
Leans positive · 61/100

Researched goals

CitedgoalTags

Areas of active research — not promised effects

Each tag links to other compounds with research into that goal. Research use only: these are areas of study, not human-use claims.

Status at a glance

CitedM0
Evidence: Limited humanUnited States: Cosmetic ingredient (OTC, no prescription required)WADA prohibited

Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 is regulated as a cosmetic ingredient in the United States under FDA cosmetics law, including the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA, 2022). It is not an FDA-approved drug, is not subject to the FDA Section 503A/503B bulk drug substance (Category II / FDA-19) lists, and requires no prescription for purchase or use in finished cosmetic products. Finished-product marketers must comply with MoCRA obligations (facility/product registration, adequate safety substantiation, and INCI-compliant labelling) effective July 2024. The CIR Expert Panel has affirmed safety as used.

Buyer-confidence index

DerivedM40
Provisional · live crawl in progress
Guarded · provisionalConfidence too low to show a precise number
Legal clarity44
Quality verifiability36
Market integrity78
Community reception61
Market depth87

Transparent blend · bci-1.0 · never paid-placement

Sourcing sub-inputs

DerivedM40
LegalclarityQualityverifiabilityMarketintegrityCommunityreceptionMarketdepth

5 cited sub-inputs, scored 0–100, before weighting.

Trust & provenance

CitedM15
PC
Reviewed by the PeptideCompass editorial team
Independent · no paid placement · last verified 2026-05-29
Changelog & edit history Methodology Report an error
01 · 02 · 25 · 09 · 37 · 38

Identity & chemistry

Identity & registry

CitedM1
Primary name
Matrixyl
Origin
Developed and commercialised by Sederma (now part of Croda) under the trade name Matrixyl®. The core sequence Lys-Thr-Thr-Lys-Ser (KTTKS) is derived from the pro-collagen I alpha 1 chain C-propeptide region. Conjugation of a palmitoyl (C16) fatty acid to the N-terminal lysine was engineered to improve partition through the stratum corneum lipid matrix and facilitate delivery to dermal fibroblasts.

Registry IDs

PubChem CID
9897237
CAS
214047-00-4
InChIKey
WSGCRSMLXFHGRM-DEVHWETNSA-N
ChEMBL
CHEMBL451881

Chemical & physical

CitedM2
Molecular formula
C39H75N7O10
Molar mass
802.1 g/mol
Monoisotopic
801.55754161 Da
InChIKey
WSGCRSMLXFHGRM-DEVHWETNSA-N
Appearance
White to off-white lyophilised powder (vendor-typical)
Solubility
Low aqueous solubility as free powder due to the lipophilic palmitoyl chain (CAS…

Structure & sequence

CitedM25
3D conformer viewerinteractive · drop PDB/MOL to compare

Sequence not available in current seed.

Storage, stability & degradation

CitedM2 · M38

Storage

Lyophilized: Store at 2–8 °C, protected from light and moisture (vendor-typical)
Reconstituted: Use promptly after preparation; stability in aqueous solution is formulation- and pH-dependent
Shelf-life: Typically 2 years as lyophilised powder under recommended st

Tell-tale degradation

  • Cloudiness or clumping
  • Discoloration
  • Failed reconstitution

Stability: Lyophilised powder is stable under cool, dry, light-protected conditions. Hydrolysis of the palmitoyl-lysine amide bond is a primary degradation pathway in aque

Forms & specifications

CitedM9
Vial sizes
null mg
Purity grades
cosmetic grade / research grade
Salt forms
Free base (primary)

SDS & lab handling

CitedM37
  • GHS hazard class on file
  • PPE & spill response
  • Disposal guidance
  • Not-for-human-consumption posture
03 · 04 · 4A · 30 · 05

Evidence & efficacy

Evidence at a glance

DerivedM4

How much research exists, and of what maturity — never a verdict on whether it works.

Preclinical45 / 100
2/3studied applications reach human-grade evidence
0completed, published human efficacy RCTs

Human efficacy is unproven: no completed, published human efficacy RCT establishes that this compound works in people. All maturity below is literature volume and kind — never a verdict on effect. No completed, published human efficacy RCT — capped at Preclinical.

Indexed articles by era

Volume and kind of literature, over time.

No data availableNo era-by-era literature breakdown on file yet.

Mechanism research coverage

Which pathways the research probes.

No data availableNo mechanism-coverage data on file yet.

Does it actually work? — proven vs anecdotal

CitedM4A
ApplicationScientific evidence (cited)GradeCommunity-reported
Reduction of facial fine lines and wrinkles (topical cosmetic use)Multiple in vitro and ex vivo studies have demonstrated concentration-dependent stimulation of collagen I and III synthe…Limited humanCommunity reports vary; no validated human efficacy data.
Extracellular matrix repair and skin photoageing (topical cosmetic use)In vitro studies demonstrate that the KTTKS core sequence and its palmitoylated form upregulate fibronectin and glycosam…Limited humanCommunity reports vary; no validated human efficacy data.
Wound healing support and skin barrier function (exploratory/in vitro)Several in vitro studies have explored whether matrikine peptides including KTTKS derivatives can support dermal wound h…Animal / in-vitroCommunity reports vary; no validated human efficacy data.
Strong humanLimited humanAnimal / in-vitroMechanisticAnecdotal only

Pharmacology

CitedM3

Mechanism of action

  • Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 is proposed to function as a matrikine: a bioactive fragment that mimics the signalling activity of collagen degradation products and thereby activates fibroblast surface receptors to initiate extracellular matrix repair responses
  • Upon penetrating the stratum corneum via its lipid anchor, the KTTKS moiety interacts with fibroblast receptors and activates downstream MAPK/ERK and TGF-β signalling cascades, upregulating transcription of collagen type I, type III, and type IV, as well as fibronectin and, to a lesser extent, elastin
  • In vitro cell culture studies have reported increases in type I collagen secretion by human fibroblasts at nanomolar to low-micromolar concentrations, and mild inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases has also been described
  • The palmitoyl chain is hydrolysed by skin esterases and lipases once the molecule reaches the dermis, releasing the free KTTKS pentapeptide and palmitic acid; the active species responsible for receptor engagement is considered to be the free peptide, though this remains to be definitively confirmed in vivo

Pharmacokinetics (ADME)

Half-life
No formal systemic half-life determined; a topical in-situ half-life of approximately 6 hours has been reported in some secondary sources but is not independently validated in peer-reviewed studies.

PK–PD note: No formal systemic pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC, t½, clearance) have been published for palmitoyl pentapeptide-4. Systemic absorption following topical cosmetic application is considered negl

Evidence & literature

CitedM4
11indexed articles
0registered human trials
2026-05-29last scanned

Reading the evidence

  • Evidence quality and gaps vary by application — see the cited grades above.
  • Indexed-article counts span all evidence tiers, not only completed human trials.
  • No first-party human-dosing, efficacy, or benefit claims are made here.

Human-trial pipeline

CitedM30

No registered human trials found for this compound.

Status
No registered trials found

Safety profile

CitedM5

Summary (literature)

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel conducted a formal safety assessment of palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (along with myristoyl pentapeptide-4 and pentapeptide-4) and concluded in its 2024 update that the ingredient is safe in cosmetics at present practices of use and co

WADA status

Not specifically listed on the 2026 WADA Prohibited List. Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 is a topically applied cosmetic signal peptide with no identified performance

NEW

Routes of administration

How Matrixyl has been studied — pharmacology, not a protocol. RUO.

Dominant research route & oral stability

CitedRoutes

Dominant research route: Topical (TOP)

Topical (cutaneous) (TOP)

Citedhuman rct
Strong human

Human facial skin (photoaged females) and animal wound-healing models; in vitro hairless mouse skin permeation

Bioavailability: In vitro hairless mouse skin: pal-KTTKS was detected in stratum corneum (4.2 ± 0.7 μg/cm²), epidermis (2.8 ± 0.5 μg/cm²), and dermis (0.3 ± 0.1 μg/cm²), but was NOT detected in the receptor solution, indicating no full-thickness permeation under the tested conditions. Unmodified KTTKS was not detected in any skin layer.

Dominant studied route. Robinson 2005: 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, split-face RCT in 93 Caucasian women (35–55 y) using 3 ppm pal-KTTKS moisturizer vs. vehicle — significant improvement in fine lines/wrinkles vs. placebo. Kachooeian 2022 (ACS Omega): in vivo animal wound-healing study comparing MTI patch vs. MTI cream (0.1 mg and 1 mg) over 21 days. Choi 2014 (Biomol Ther): pal-KTTKS more stable than KTTKS in skin extracts/homogenates; both rapidly degraded without protease inhibitors.

4B · 10

Dosage reference & research tools

Dosage reference spectrum

UGC · disclaimedM4B
Studied rangeCitedHuman · topical0.001–0.01 % w/w in leave-on topical formulation
Studied minCitedInvitro · in vitro1–10 ppm (µg/mL) in cell culture
Vendor statedUGCHuman · topical0.001–0.012 % w/w in finished cosmetic formulation

CitedStudied doses (animal / preclinical)

No systemic animal dose-response studies were identified in retrieved literature; in vitro experiments with human dermal fibroblast cultures report biological activity in the range of 1–10 ppm (approximately 1.25–12.5 µM) of palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (cited in CIR safety assessment and PMID 31481944). These are cell-culture concentrations and not translatable to topical application dosing without formulation context.

UGCCommunity-reported (not validated · not medical advice)

DISCLAIMER — not first-party guidance: Cosmetic formulators and vendors commonly report use concentrations of 0.001–0.01% (10–100 ppm) in leave-on serums and creams, with the CIR safety assessment citing a maximum reported concentration of approximately 0.012% in leave-on products. These figures are presented for research reference only. PeptideCompass does not endorse, recommend, or validate any dosage, formulation concentration, or application protocol.

Animal & human figures are kept visibly separate so studied animal doses are never misread as human guidance.

Reconstitution calculator

UGC · disclaimedM10
mg
mL
Concentration
5.00 mg/mL
For a 250 mcg reference unitdraw 0.050 mL= 5.0 units (U-100)
Reconstituted stability22 of 28 days left

Research unit-conversion only · not for human use

07 · 08 · 24 · 34 · 35 · 33

Vendors & price intelligence

United States

Vendor & price comparison

CitedM7 · M8

Sorted A–Z by vendor — never by price

Median $/mg
$0.902
Range $0.520$12.90
Vendors tracked
6
In stock
4
With COA
6
Weekly median · 4w

As of 2026-08-05· research-catalog listings, dated & cited — no ranking, no commission earned, never sorted by price. Research use only.

VendorFormat · sizePricePrice / mgCOAStockSource
BEBehemoth Labz
10 mgVial$19.10$1.912026-07-30
BIBiotech Peptides
200 mgVial$190$0.9502026-08-04
COCore Peptides
200 mgVial$171$0.8552026-08-03
IOIon Peptide
10 mgVial$129$12.902026-08-02
UMUmbrella Labs
200 mgVial$105$0.5252026-07-24
VEVerified Peptides
200 mgVial$104$0.5202026-07-31

Crawled vendor listings, sorted A–Z by vendor — never by price.

Price-per-mg history

CitedM8
$0.96$0.93$0.893w2w1wnow

Weekly median $/mg from the live vendor crawl.

Price distribution

DerivedM8

Researched storefront prices, bucketed

Provisional · live crawl in progress
< $5
5 vendors
$5–6.9
0 vendors
$7–8.9
0 vendors
$9–10.9
0 vendors
≥ $11
0 vendors

p25 $0.950 · median $1.82 · p75 $1.99 · 8 researched vendors

Legit, COA-backed band: $0.855$2.20/mg.

Cross-region & vial-size economics

DerivedM8

Cross-region pricing

United States (researched)
$1.82/mg
Canada
Collecting
United Kingdom
Collecting
European Union
Collecting

Only the US market has been researched so far — no FX conversion is applied.

Vial-size economics

10 mg vial
3 vendors offer it
20 mg vial
1 vendor offers it
200 mg vial
3 vendors offer it

Bigger vials generally lower $/mg but raise reconstitution-waste risk.

Cost & value analytics

DerivedM24
Provisional · live crawl in progress
$0.855min /mg
$1.82median /mg
$2.20max /mg

Value rule: don't just buy the cheapest — a price under $3/mg is a red flag. Pair price with COA and independent-test grade.

Estimated cost of research (10 mg)

Vial (best researched price)
$9
Bacteriostatic water (generic estimate)
$6
Syringes / supplies (generic estimate)
$12

Vendor reliability

M34
No data availableOn-time / reship reliability metrics require the live crawl's fulfillment history, which is not collected yet.

Bulk / B2B procurement

M35
No data availableWholesale / vendor-direct pricing tiers are not researched yet.

Licensed clinics & 503A

CitedM33

Segregated from gray-market research vendors · shown only where lawful.

Opens as US reclassification formalizes
19 · 36 · 20 · 18 · 32

Quality, verification & alerts

Quality, testing & COA verification

CitedM19 · M36

What each test proves — general guidance, plus this compound's researched purity data

HPLC
Purity %
Mass spec (MS)
Identity — the only proof it is the right molecule
Potency / quantitation
Catches underdosing
Endotoxin (LAL)
EU/mg
Heavy metals
Contamination
Residual solvents
Process residue
Sterility / bioburden
Microbial
Lot / batch traceability
Provenance
Verify your vial's COA — paste a Janoshik task # to check authenticity & recency (< 6 mo).

Purity on the current market (researched)

Vendor CoA reports 99.66% purity (HPLC) for palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (MedChemExpress, Cat. HY-P0045); cosmetic-grade material is commonly marketed at ≥95% purity. No independent third-party purity range for Matrixyl was retrievable from Janoshik public portal (access blocked).

Independent labs cited for this compound

Counterfeit & recall alerts

CitedM20

No Matrixyl (palmitoyl pentapeptide-4)-specific FDA recalls, market withdrawals, or safety alerts were found in FDA's recall database or warning-letter index. Matrixyl is regulated as a cosmetic ingredient (INCI: Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4), not an FDA-approved drug, so drug-recall/enforcement pathways generally do not apply.

Buyer red-flag checklist

  • Matrixyl has no FDA approval for any therapeutic indication; it is regulated as a cosmetic ingredient (INCI: Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4), so any vendor marketing it with disease-treatment/structure-function drug claims is misbranding.
  • Vendor-supplied CoAs (e.g., 99.66% purity claims) are not independent third-party verification; Janoshik and similar independent portals are the appropriate verification route but returned no retrievable Matrixyl-specific public results.
  • 'Research use only' / 'not for human consumption' labeling on a cosmetic peptide is a common evasion pattern; FDA has warned peptide vendors (e.g., USApeptide.com, 02/26/2025) that such disclaimers do not negate drug status when therapeutic claims are present (that warning letter targeted semaglutide/tirzepatide, not Matrixyl).
  • Cosmetic-grade purity thresholds (≥95%) are lower than pharmaceutical-grade expectations; buyers should not assume pharmaceutical-grade quality from cosmetic-ingredient suppliers.
  • No Matrixyl-specific recalls or criminal enforcement actions were found — absence of enforcement reflects its cosmetic (non-drug) regulatory category, not verified quality assurance.

Manufacturing, grade & supply chain

CitedM18

GMP vs research-grade: the chemistry (SPPS + HPLC + MS) is identical — the difference is the quality system.

Underdosing / mislabeling: No retrievable independent lab-test aggregate (Janoshik/MZ Biolabs/Finnrick) quantifying Matrixyl underdosing prevalence was accessible. A vendor buyer-guide snippet alleging 7 of 12 online Matrixyl 3000 vendors supplied sub-potency material could not be retrieved (page returned 404) and is therefore not cited.

Shipping, customs & landed cost

CitedM32
  • FDA Import Alert 66-78 'Detention Without Physical Examination of Drugs, Based Upon Analytic Test Results' authorizes DWPE of drug products/APIs that appear adulterated due to contamination, substandard quality, or ingredient substitution. This is a general drug-quality alert, not Matrixyl-specific; Matrixyl is marketed as a cosmetic ingredient rather than a drug, so the alert does not directly target it.66-78
  • An RUO label is not an import exemption — CBP judges actual intended use.
  • Lyophilized powder is ambient-stable in transit; temperature control needed for > 7-day transit.
  • US-warehouse vendors dodge import scrutiny — they cost more but ship more reliably.
06 · 6A · 31 · 44

Regulatory & developments

United States

Regulatory status & timeline

CitedM6
2012
CIR Expert Panel began safety assessment of palmitoyl oligopeptides including palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (Matrixyl); industry reported use to FDA via the Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program (VCRP). [Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)]
2022-12-29
Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 — the most significant expansion of FDA authority to regulate cosmetics since the FD&C Act of 1938. Establishes facility registration, product listing, adverse event reporting, mandatory recall authority, and GMP requirements for cosmetic products. [U.S. FDA]
2024-10
CIR Expert Panel issued a Final Report concluding Myristoyl Pentapeptide-4, Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4, and Pentapeptide-4 are safe as used in cosmetics. [Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Post-Meeting Announcement]
2025-01-01Current
WADA 2025 Prohibited List entered into force. Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (Matrixyl) is not listed as a prohibited substance; it is a cosmetic matrikine with no performance-enhancing classification. [World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)]
2025-12-29
FDA published a report on the use of PFAS in cosmetic products and associated risks, as required under MoCRA. [U.S. FDA]

Latest news & developments

CitedM6A

Every item dated & sourced

WADA anti-doping status

CitedWADA

Not prohibited. Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (Matrixyl) is a topical cosmetic matrikine and is not listed on the WADA 2025 Prohibited List. WADA prohibits peptide hormones, growth factors, and mimetics under S2 (e.g., GH-releasing peptides), but cosmetic skin-care peptides like palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 are not included.

Source

Patent & IP landscape

CitedM31

No granted patents identified in current seed. Composition-of-matter coverage is limited given the peptide's synthetic origin.

Use-context & responsibility

CitedM44
  • IACUC / IRB research context
  • RUO buyer responsibilities & documentation
  • Veterinary / alternative-use where lawful
  • Jurisdiction-aware "who may lawfully obtain"
12 · 17 · 22 · 39 · 13 · 11 · 23

Community, sentiment & answers

FAQ

CitedM13
Matrixyl® refers specifically to palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 (INCI: Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4), a single lipidated signal peptide with the core sequence KTTKS. Matrixyl 3000® is a subsequent formulation blend developed by Sederma that combines palmitoyl tetrapeptide-7 (Pal-GQPR) with palmitoyl tripeptide-1 (Pal-GHK); it is a two-peptide mixture rather than a single compound and has a distinct identity from the original Matrixyl ingredient.

Community sentiment

UGC · disclaimedM22
Research-seeded estimate — the tone mix is manually researched; contribution counts are illustrative until the live pipeline arms.
Community signal · Layer BLeans positiveHow it's received in discussion — not whether it works.
61/100
Positive 55%Neutral 25%Critical 20%

Based on 40 qualifying contributions across 2 platforms, last 90 daysModerate signal

Not enough history to show a trend yet.

What this is — and is not
Is

A read on how this compound is received in public discussion — the balance of positive, neutral and critical mentions over time.

Is not

Not a measure of whether it works, is safe, or is effective; not medical advice; the unverified opinions of anonymous community members (Layer B).

Community Sentiment — Layer B. This reflects the tone of public discussion across Reddit, Bluesky, YouTube and X over the last 90 days (as of 2025-11-12). It measures how a compound is discussed and received, not whether it is safe, effective, or appropriate for any use. It is not medical, dosing, or purchasing advice and is not an endorsement. Posts are aggregated and de-identified; individual comments, claims, and dosing discussion are never shown. Research use only.

Community themes & reported concerns

Research-seeded · not liveUGC · disclaimedM12 · M39

What people discuss

Hydration / plumping effect reports vs collagen-boosting claims
30
Layering / compatibility with vitamin C, copper peptides, retinoids
25
Brand and concentration comparison (The Ordinary, Timeless, Depology, Sederma)
20
Short-term vs long-term visible results debate
15
Counterfeit / fake product and fake-review reports
10

Reported concerns — discussion, not established effects

No visible results / 'did nothing' reported in discussion
35%
Dryness, itchiness, peeling reported in discussion
15%
Stickiness / texture complaints reported in discussion
10%
Watery or off-smelling product received (counterfeit suspicion) reported in discussion
12%

Reading caveats

  • Sponsor-influenced YouTube content (e.g., Depology-sponsored Matrixyl 3000 review)
  • Affiliate / aggregator review sites with commercial incentive
  • Brand-sponsored dermatologist commentary in lifestyle media
  • Self-selected reviewer base on aggregator (Deciem enthusiasts)

Manually researched from reddit, youtube— theme weights are research estimates, not live counts; aggregated & de-identified. No individual posts, quotes, or usernames are ever shown.

41 · 21 · 42 · 28 · 27 · 26 · 29 · 43 · 14 · 16

Tools, market & meta

Research & market activity

M21

Relative research / market volume — populated once the activity stream is wired

No data availableA per-compound research and market activity stream is not collected yet.

Ask this datasheet

CitedM41
Grounded only in this compound's cited data · refuses dosing advice

Watch & listing momentum

M21
No data availableWatch and listing momentum derive from the vendor crawl, not yet wired for this compound.

Lifecycle & market history

M42
No data availableMarket lifecycle and price history are not collected for this compound yet.

Data confidence & contribute

CitedM28
VerifiedVendor-statedCommunityStale

Glossary & reading mode

CitedM27

Inline tooltips for lyophilized, RUO, EU/mg, SPPS, 503A and more.

Toggle plain-language ↔ scientific in the header.

Guides & explainers

CitedM26
  • How to read a COA
  • Free base vs acetate
  • Understanding evidence grades

Market intelligence

M43
No data availableCategory sizing and demand intelligence are not collected for this compound yet.

Citable summary (GEO)

DerivedM14

Palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 signal peptide that mimics collagen matrikine fragments to stimulate extracellular matrix synthesis in dermal fibroblasts. Approximately 11 articles are indexed (literature last scanned 2026-05-29). US regulatory status: Cosmetic ingredient (OTC, no prescription required). Research use only.

Emitted as JSON-LD: ChemicalSubstance · BreadcrumbList · FAQPage.

Save, track & alerts

CitedM16
  • Price-drop & back-in-stock alerts
  • Regulatory-change email digest
  • Print / share this datasheet

Export, citation & data

CitedM29
10 sources · reviewed by the PeptideCompass editorial team