Overview
The single most cited surfaceDihexa
Research use onlyMetabolically stabilized angiotensin IV analog investigated preclinically as a procognitive HGF/c-Met agonist; no human trials completed.
Researched goals
Areas of active research — not promised effects
Each tag links to other compounds with research into that goal. Research use only: these are areas of study, not human-use claims.
Similar peptides
Related by research scope · open each to compare
Status at a glance
Dihexa has no FDA-approved indication and no active IND. It may be sold for in vitro / laboratory research purposes only. It is not legal to prescribe, dispense, or administer to humans in a clinical or consumer context.
Buyer-confidence index
Transparent blend · bci-1.0 · never paid-placement
Sourcing sub-inputs
5 cited sub-inputs, scored 0–100, before weighting.
Trust & provenance
Identity & chemistry
Identity & registry
- Primary name
- Dihexa
- Origin
- Synthetic derivative of the endogenous angiotensin IV heptapeptide, engineered at Washington State University with terminal modifications (N-hexanoyl and C-aminohexanoic amide caps) to confer metabolic stability and oral bioavailability.
Registry IDs
- PubChem CID
- 129010512
- CAS
- 1401708-83-5
- InChIKey
- XEUVNVNAVKZSPT-JTJYXVOQSA-N
Chemical & physical
- Molecular formula
- C27H44N4O5
- Molar mass
- 504.7 g/mol
- Monoisotopic
- 504.33117052 Da
- InChIKey
- XEUVNVNAVKZSPT-JTJYXVOQSA-N
- Appearance
- White to off-white lyophilized powder
- Solubility
- Soluble in DMSO; moderate solubility in aqueous solutions; solubility enhanced a…
Structure & sequence
Sequence not available in current seed.
Storage, stability & degradation
Storage
Lyophilized: -20°C, desiccated, protected from light
Reconstituted: 2–8°C; use within 7–14 days (vendor-typical guidance)
Shelf-life: 2 years lyophilized under recommended conditions (vendor-sta
Tell-tale degradation
Stability: Metabolically stabilized by N-hexanoyl and C-aminohexanoic amide end-caps; more resistant to peptidase degradation than native angiotensin IV. Stability in biol
Forms & specifications
- Vial sizes
- 5 mg · 10 mg
- Purity grades
- ≥98% HPLC
- Salt forms
- Free base (primary)
SDS & lab handling
Evidence & efficacy
Evidence at a glance
How much research exists, and of what maturity — never a verdict on whether it works.
Human efficacy is unproven: no completed, published human efficacy RCT establishes that this compound works in people. All maturity below is literature volume and kind — never a verdict on effect. No completed, published human efficacy RCT — capped at Preclinical.
Indexed articles by era
Volume and kind of literature, over time.
Across all eras, by kind
Mechanism research coverage
Which pathways the research probes.
Does it actually work? — proven vs anecdotal
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Pharmacokinetics (ADME)
- Half-life
- Estimated 2–4 hours in rodent plasma (unpublished peer-reviewed data; figure from secondary/vendor sources only)
PK–PD note: Engineered for oral bioavailability and blood-brain barrier penetration via terminal fatty-acid and amine capping. Formal peer-reviewed PK characterization in animals has not been published as of 2026…
Evidence & literature
Reading the evidence
Key reviews & evidence-gap sources
Human-trial pipeline
No registered human trials found for this compound.
- Status
- No registered trials found
Safety profile
Summary (literature)
No formal safety or toxicology studies in humans have been published. No completed human clinical trials appear in ClinicalTrials.gov as of May 2026. In rodent experiments, dihexa has generally been reported to be well tolerated at low doses, with transient hyperactivity noted in…
WADA status
Not specifically listed on the WADA 2026 Prohibited List. Dihexa does not fall under the defined categories of prohibited peptide hormones, growth factors, or g…
Routes of administration
How Dihexa has been studied — pharmacology, not a protocol. RUO.Dominant research route & oral stability
Dominant research route: Intraperitoneal (IP) was the dominant in-vivo efficacy route in the foundational rat studies; IV was used for pharmacokinetic profiling; oral activity was a designed and claimed property.
Intravenous (IV)
Pharmacokinetic characterization in Sprague-Dawley rats (in vivo)
Bioavailability: IV administration in rats yielded a serum half-life of approximately 12.7 days (12.68 days), reflecting extraordinary metabolic stability and tissue binding for a 504.66 Da molecule; IV defines 100% systemic exposure reference.
IV was used for pharmacokinetic profiling in McCoy et al. 2013 (JPET 344:141–154). An Expression of Concern was issued for this paper in 2021 (JPET 378:313).
Intraperitoneal (IP)
Pharmacokinetic and cognitive efficacy studies in rats (scopolamine-deficit and aged rat models)
Bioavailability: IP administration in rats yielded a serum half-life of approximately 8.8 days (8.83 days); IP was a primary route for in vivo cognitive restoration studies.
IP was the dominant route for in vivo procognitive efficacy experiments (Morris water maze) in McCoy et al. 2013. The ALZdiscovery Cognitive Vitality report also references IP administration with a serum half-life of 335.5 minutes (likely an in-vitro serum-stability context distinct from in-vivo terminal half-life).
Oral (PO)
Oral activity demonstrated in rodent models (rats); designed as an orally active analog
Bioavailability: Dihexa was specifically engineered with N-hexanoyl and 6-aminohexanoic amide modifications to eliminate peptidase-sensitive bonds and confer oral bioavailability and blood-brain barrier permeability; described as 'orally active' in primary literature. No quantitative oral bioavailability fraction (F%) was published in the retrieved primary sources.
Oral activity is a designed property cited in McCoy et al. 2013 ('orally active, blood-barrier permeant') and Benoist et al. 2014 (PMC4201273). NOTE: Benoist et al. 2014 was RETRACTED in 2025 (JPET 392:103567), and McCoy et al. 2013 received an Expression of Concern in 2021 — oral-activity claims rest on publications with data-integrity flags.
Subcutaneous (SC)
Community/anecdotal route; not a primary route in published peer-reviewed PK studies
Bioavailability: No peer-reviewed SC pharmacokinetic data was located; community sources assert SC achieves higher systemic absorption than oral, but these are unsourced aggregator claims (e.g., '85–95% systemic absorption') not traceable to primary literature.
SC appears in community/aggregator protocols as a 'primary' administration method, but the foundational peer-reviewed studies (McCoy 2013, Benoist 2014) used IV, IP, and oral routes — not SC. SC PK data is absent from retrieved primary sources.
Intranasal (IN)
Community/anecdotal route only; no peer-reviewed intranasal study located
Bioavailability: Community aggregator sources describe intranasal use at lower dose equivalents (e.g., '0.1–1 mg/kg') claiming higher CNS delivery, but no primary literature supports intranasal pharmacokinetics for dihexa.
Intranasal is mentioned only in community/aggregator dosage guides; no published preclinical or clinical intranasal study was found in retrieved sources.
Dosage reference & research tools
Dosage reference spectrum
CitedStudied doses (animal / preclinical)
Rodent studies have employed doses in the range of approximately 0.5–10 mg/kg administered orally or subcutaneously; cognitive benefit in Morris water maze paradigms has been demonstrated at lower end doses in APP/PS1 mice (cited: PMID 34827486). Precise dose–response characterization across multiple studies has not been consolidated in a systematic review.
UGCCommunity-reported (not validated · not medical advice)
DISCLAIMER: Community and vendor sources report subcutaneous doses of 0.05–0.5 mg per session in adult humans; these figures are entirely anecdotal, lack any peer-reviewed support, and are provided here solely as contextual reference. They do not constitute guidance, recommendations, or protocols of any kind. PeptideCompass does not endorse human use of dihexa outside a regulated clinical research context.
Animal & human figures are kept visibly separate so studied animal doses are never misread as human guidance.
Reconstitution calculator
Research unit-conversion only · not for human use
Vendors & price intelligence
United StatesVendor & price comparison
Sorted A–Z by vendor — never by price
As of 2026-08-05· research-catalog listings, dated & cited — no ranking, no commission earned, never sorted by price. Research use only.
Crawled vendor listings, sorted A–Z by vendor — never by price.
Price-per-mg history
Weekly median $/mg from the live vendor crawl.
Price distribution
Researched storefront prices, bucketed
Provisional · live crawl in progressp25 $3.90 · median $7.00 · p75 $14.00 · 12 researched vendors
Legit, COA-backed band: $3.90–$16.92/mg.
Cross-region & vial-size economics
Cross-region pricing
- United States (researched)
- $7.00/mg
- Canada
- Collecting
- United Kingdom
- Collecting
- European Union
- Collecting
Only the US market has been researched so far — no FX conversion is applied.
Vial-size economics
- 5 mg vial
- 3 vendors offer it
- 10 mg vial
- 3 vendors offer it
- 25 mg vial
- 1 vendor offers it
- 50 mg vial
- 1 vendor offers it
- 100 mg vial
- 1 vendor offers it
- 240 mg vial
- 1 vendor offers it
- 300 mg vial
- 3 vendors offer it
- 500 mg vial
- 1 vendor offers it
Bigger vials generally lower $/mg but raise reconstitution-waste risk.
Cost & value analytics
Value rule: don't just buy the cheapest — a price under $3/mg is a red flag. Pair price with COA and independent-test grade.
Estimated cost of research (10 mg)
- Vial (best researched price)
- $2
- Bacteriostatic water (generic estimate)
- $6
- Syringes / supplies (generic estimate)
- $12
Vendor reliability
Bulk / B2B procurement
Licensed clinics & 503A
Segregated from gray-market research vendors · shown only where lawful.
Quality, verification & alerts
Quality, testing & COA verification
What each test proves — general guidance, plus this compound's researched purity data
Purity on the current market (researched)
Vendor-claimed '>98% purity' is the prevailing market standard for research-grade Dihexa; no independent aggregate purity range for Dihexa specifically was located in retrieved sources.
Independent labs cited for this compound
- Expected MS
- 504.7 Da
Counterfeit & recall alerts
No FDA enforcement reports, recalls, market withdrawals, or safety alerts naming Dihexa were found in FDA's recall/enforcement databases. None found.
Buyer red-flag checklist
Manufacturing, grade & supply chain
GMP vs research-grade: the chemistry (SPPS + HPLC + MS) is identical — the difference is the quality system.
Underdosing / mislabeling: No Dihexa-specific underdosing prevalence from independent lab aggregates (Janoshik / MZ Biolabs / Finnrick) was retrievable. Finnrick's partner-lab registry lists published test counts by lab (Krause Analytical 5,367; BTLabs 1,974; Chromate 672; TrustPointe 315; Freedom Diagnostics 216; Janoshik 195; MZ Biolabs 179) but these are cross-peptide totals, not Dihexa-specific. Janoshik lists a 'Dihexa analysis' (ID, amount and purity) service, but the individual report page was not retrievable (HTTP 403).
Shipping, customs & landed cost
Regulatory & developments
United StatesRegulatory status & timeline
Latest news & developments
Every item dated & sourced
WADA anti-doping status
Dihexa is not named explicitly on the WADA Prohibited List but, as a non-approved pharmacological substance, falls under WADA Prohibited List category S0 (Non-Approved Substances), prohibited at all times in and out of competition.
SourcePatent & IP landscape
No granted patents identified in current seed. Composition-of-matter coverage is limited given the peptide's synthetic origin.
Use-context & responsibility
Community, sentiment & answers
FAQ
Community sentiment
Based on 40 qualifying contributions across 2 platforms, last 90 daysModerate signal
Not enough history to show a trend yet.
What this is — and is not
A read on how this compound is received in public discussion — the balance of positive, neutral and critical mentions over time.
Not a measure of whether it works, is safe, or is effective; not medical advice; the unverified opinions of anonymous community members (Layer B).
Community Sentiment — Layer B. This reflects the tone of public discussion across Reddit, Bluesky, YouTube and X over the last 90 days (as of 2026-05-20). It measures how a compound is discussed and received, not whether it is safe, effective, or appropriate for any use. It is not medical, dosing, or purchasing advice and is not an endorsement. Posts are aggregated and de-identified; individual comments, claims, and dosing discussion are never shown. Research use only.
Community themes & reported concerns
What people discuss
Reported concerns — discussion, not established effects
Reading caveats
Manually researched from reddit, youtube— theme weights are research estimates, not live counts; aggregated & de-identified. No individual posts, quotes, or usernames are ever shown.
Tools, market & meta
Research & market activity
Relative research / market volume — populated once the activity stream is wired
Ask this datasheet
Watch & listing momentum
Lifecycle & market history
Data confidence & contribute
Glossary & reading mode
Inline tooltips for lyophilized, RUO, EU/mg, SPPS, 503A and more.
Toggle plain-language ↔ scientific in the header.
Guides & explainers
Market intelligence
Citable summary (GEO)
Metabolically stabilized angiotensin IV analog investigated preclinically as a procognitive HGF/c-Met agonist; no human trials completed. Approximately 17 articles are indexed (literature last scanned 2026-05-29). US regulatory status: Research Use Only — not approved, not compoundable. Research use only.
Emitted as JSON-LD: ChemicalSubstance · BreadcrumbList · FAQPage.