Sign inCompoundsMitochondrial Blend
Layer A — first-party, cited authorityLayer B — disclaimed UGC & research toolsNo first-party human-dosing guidance, ever.
00–01 · 40 · 15

Overview

The single most cited surface

Mitochondrial Blend

Research use onlyTrending

peptideMitoStack5-Amino-1MQ / MOTS-C / NAD+Mito BlendMitoStack — 120mg Mitochondrial Blend (MOTS-c 10mg / 5-Amino-1MQ 10mg/ NAD+ 100mg)
studies indexed
last verified
Best verified price / mg
from $2.29/mg
across 1 tracked vendor · United States
Median $/mg
Studies indexed
Evidence maturity
Preclinical · 6/100
Community sentiment
Divided reception

Similar peptides

M11 · M23

Related by research scope · open each to compare

No data availableNo related compounds are linked for this entry yet.

Status at a glance

CitedM0
United States: Research use only

Regulatory detail for this region is not available in the current seed.

Buyer-confidence index

DerivedM40
Provisional · live crawl in progress
Guarded · provisional
60/ 100
Legal clarity66
Quality verifiability69
Market integrity58
Market depth87

Confirmed high-severity market-integrity event (enforcement / recall / counterfeit)

Transparent blend · bci-1.0 · never paid-placement

Sourcing sub-inputs

DerivedM40
LegalclarityQualityverifiabilityMarketintegrityMarketdepth

4 cited sub-inputs, scored 0–100, before weighting.

Trust & provenance

CitedM15
PC
Reviewed by the PeptideCompass editorial team
Independent · no paid placement · last verified
Changelog & edit history Methodology Report an error
01 · 02 · 25 · 09 · 37 · 38

Identity & chemistry

Identity & registry

CitedM1
Primary name
Mitochondrial Blend

Structure & sequence

CitedM25
Multi-component blend · 3 constituentsNo single molecule — see each constituent’s structure.

Sequence not available in current seed.

SDS & lab handling

CitedM37
  • GHS hazard class on file
  • PPE & spill response
  • Disposal guidance
  • Not-for-human-consumption posture
NEW

Blend components

Mitochondrial Blend is a blend — its science is inherited from each cited component, not measured as a single molecule.

5-Amino-1MQ

Animal / in-vitroCitedBlend

Small-molecule NNMT inhibitor that elevates cellular NAD+ and SAM in adipose tissue, reversing diet-induced obesity in rodent preclinical models without reducing food intake.

Small-molecule enzyme inhibitor (quinolinium salt; NNMT inhibitor)

5-Amino-1MQ competitively occupies the nicotinamide-binding pocket of NNMT, blocking methyl group transfer from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to nicotinamide. This inhibition conserves intracellular SAM and diverts nicotinamide toward NAD+ biosynthesis, raising NAD+ concentrations in white adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Elevated NAD+ activates SIRT1 and related sirtuins, which shift cellular metabolism toward increased fatty acid oxidation and reduced lipogenesis. In diet-induced obese rodents, the net effect is reduced adipocyte size, lower white adipose mass, improved glucose tolerance, and enhanced insulin sensitivity, all without suppression of food intake (PMID 29155147; PMID 39161060).

View full datasheet

MOTS-c

Limited humanCitedBlend

Mitochondria-encoded 16-mer peptide activating AMPK via the folate-AICAR axis; studied for metabolic regulation, insulin sensitivity, and exercise adaptation.

Mitochondrial-derived peptide (MDP); 16-mer mitochondrial open reading frame peptide

MOTS-c primarily operates through the folate-AICAR-AMPK signaling axis: the peptide inhibits the folate cycle, leading to accumulation of the purine synthesis intermediate AICAR (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide), which in turn activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK activation triggers downstream effects including enhanced glucose uptake, increased fatty acid oxidation, suppression of gluconeogenesis, and promotion of mitochondrial biogenesis. Under cellular stress, MOTS-c also translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it binds and upregulates antioxidant response element (ARE)-driven stress-adaptation genes, functioning as a retrograde mitochondrial stress signal. In preclinical models of type 2 diabetes, exogenous MOTS-c administration has been shown to restore mitochondrial respiration and improve insulin signaling in skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue.

Molar mass
2174.6 g/mol
View full datasheet

NAD+

Limited humanCitedBlend

Endogenous coenzyme central to cellular energy metabolism, redox signaling, and longevity-related enzyme activity; levels decline with age.

Pyridine nucleotide coenzyme / small molecule NAD+ precursor/metabolite

NAD+ functions as an essential redox cofactor, cycling between its oxidized (NAD+) and reduced (NADH) forms to drive mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis. Beyond its redox role, NAD+ is the obligate substrate for three major enzyme classes: sirtuins (SIRT1–7), which use NAD+ for NAD+-dependent protein deacylation to regulate gene expression, mitochondrial biogenesis, and stress responses; poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), which consume NAD+ during DNA damage repair; and the ectoenzyme CD38/CD157, which hydrolyzes NAD+ to modulate calcium signaling. Intracellular NAD+ levels decline progressively with age, partly due to chronic PARP and CD38 activation outpacing biosynthesis via NAMPT (the rate-limiting salvage enzyme), leading to reduced sirtuin activity and impaired mitochondrial function. Research has focused on whether restoring NAD+ levels through precursor supplementation or direct administration can reverse aspects of this age-associated decline.

Molar mass
663.4 g/mol
View full datasheet
03 · 04 · 4A · 30 · 05

Evidence & efficacy

Evidence at a glance

DerivedM4

How much research exists, and of what maturity — never a verdict on whether it works.

Preclinical6 / 100
0/0studied applications reach human-grade evidence
0completed, published human efficacy RCTs

Human efficacy is unproven: no completed, published human efficacy RCT establishes that this compound works in people. All maturity below is literature volume and kind — never a verdict on effect. No completed, published human efficacy RCT — capped at Preclinical.

Indexed articles by era

Volume and kind of literature, over time.

pre-2020
2020-2024
2025-present

Across all eras, by kind

Animal / in-vitro0
Mechanistic0
Human0

Mechanism research coverage

Which pathways the research probes.

Folate–AICAR…NAD+salvage…NNMTinhibit…

Does it actually work? — proven vs anecdotal

CitedM4A
Strong humanLimited humanAnimal / in-vitroMechanisticAnecdotal only

Pharmacology

CitedM3

Evidence & literature

CitedM4
indexed articles
0registered human trials
last scanned

Reading the evidence

  • Evidence quality and gaps vary by application — see the cited grades above.
  • Indexed-article counts span all evidence tiers, not only completed human trials.
  • No first-party human-dosing, efficacy, or benefit claims are made here.

Key reviews & evidence-gap sources

Human-trial pipeline

CitedM30

No registered human trials found for this compound.

Status
No registered trials found
NEW

Routes of administration

How Mitochondrial Blend has been studied — pharmacology, not a protocol. RUO.

Dominant research route & oral stability

CitedRoutes

Dominant research route: Subcutaneous (SC). Every vendor surveyed sells the blend as a single lyophilized vial (NAD+ 100 mg / MOTS-c 10 mg / 5-Amino-1MQ 10 mg) for reconstitution and injection — never oral, patch, or nasal. No formal pharmacokinetic study of the three-component blend as a combined unit exists in any species or by any route; every figure below is COMPONENT-level. A PubMed search for the blend as a named product returns zero indexed results.

Subcutaneous (SC)

Citedanimal invitro
Animal / in-vitro

No formal PK study of the three-component blend as a combined unit exists in any species. As sold, the blend is uniformly a single lyophilized vial (NAD+ 100 mg / MOTS-c 10 mg / 5-Amino-1MQ 10 mg) intended for reconstitution and SC injection. Component-level: native MOTS-c is in a recruiting Phase 2a SC trial (NCT07505745); its engineered analog CB4211 completed a Phase 1a/1b SC trial (NCT03998514, CohBar) — CB4211 is NOT native MOTS-c and is not sold in this blend. 5-Amino-1MQ has been SC-dosed in mice (25 mg/kg). Intact NAD+ has no dedicated SC PK study in any species.

Bioavailability: Component-level only. 5-Amino-1MQ: SC dosing (25 mg/kg) in mice reached Cmax ~7,010 ng/mL at Tmax ~15 min, terminal half-life ~12.8–13.3 h (Babula et al. 2024, PMID 39161060). Native MOTS-c: no completed human SC PK published — the only completed human SC data belong to the CB4211 ANALOG, not the native peptide. Intact NAD+: no published SC bioavailability data in any species.

Component-level, not blend-level. The dominant 'as sold' route mirrors how each ingredient is individually dosed in animal studies or, for MOTS-c only, in a human trial of a DIFFERENT (analog) molecule. [Verification: CB4211 = an improved synthetic ANALOG of MOTS-c per CohBar's own release; NCT03998514 overallStatus COMPLETED (2021-04-19) but no results posted on CT.gov (topline via press release) — never present as human validation of native MOTS-c or the blend.] No human dosing protocol is implied.

Oral / per-os (PO)

Citedanimal invitro
Animal / in-vitro

No oral study of the blend as a unit exists, and none of the surveyed vendors sell an oral version. Component-level animal data only: 5-Amino-1MQ oral bioavailability measured in two studies with materially different results — 38.4% in Sprague-Dawley rats (Awosemo et al. 2021, PMID 34304009) vs 3.5% in C57BL/6 mice (Babula et al. 2024, PMID 39161060). Intact NAD+ and MOTS-c have no published oral PK.

Bioavailability: 5-Amino-1MQ (rat, PMID 34304009): oral Cmax 2,252 ng/mL, AUC0-∞ 14,431 h·ng/mL, oral t½ 6.90±1.20 h vs IV 3.80±1.10 h, oral F 38.4%. 5-Amino-1MQ (mouse, 30 mg/kg PO, PMID 39161060): Cmax 14.5 ng/mL (Tmax 4 h), AUC0-∞ 224 h·ng/mL, oral F only 3.5%, oral t½ 14.8 h — [Verification: a GENUINE species-dependent discrepancy (~10× lower in mouse), NOT a human finding either way; vendor/SEO copy quoting the rat 38.4% without the species caveat is misleading]. MOTS-c: no published oral figure. Intact NAD+: hydrolyzed by intestinal nucleotidases/phosphatases before absorption; oral human evidence belongs to precursors NMN/NR, not the intact coenzyme.

Component-level, not blend-level. None of the three actives has a human oral study, and the blend is not marketed in oral form. No oral human protocol is implied.

Intramuscular (IM)

UGC · disclaimedhuman anecdotal
Community-reported

No dedicated IM study exists for any of the three named actives. The only registered human trial touching this route is a Phase 1 safety pilot of injectable nicotinamide riboside — an NAD+ PRECURSOR, not intact NAD+ and not this blend — with SC and IM arms, still recruiting (NCT07251608). MOTS-c and 5-Amino-1MQ have no published IM data.

Bioavailability: No published IM PK data exist for MOTS-c, 5-Amino-1MQ, or intact NAD+. IM NAD+ is offered by IV-therapy/wellness clinics as an alternative to IV/SC dosing; clinic material describes it as faster-onset than SC, but this is commercial framing, not a peer-reviewed PK finding.

Component-level (NAD+ only) and largely clinic-marketing framing; not a studied route for this blend, MOTS-c, or 5-Amino-1MQ. No human dosing protocol is implied.

Intravenous (IV)

Citedhuman obs
Limited human

No IV study of the blend exists. Component-level: intact NAD+ has one completed human pilot — a 6-hour, ~750 mg IV infusion in 11 healthy men (8 test / 3 saline control) measuring the plasma/urine NAD+ metabolome (Grant et al. 2019, PMID 31572171) — plus a small retrospective real-world tolerability comparison of IV NAD+ vs IV nicotinamide riboside. 5-Amino-1MQ has only animal IV PK (rat and mouse). MOTS-c has no published IV data.

Bioavailability: NAD+ component: 100% bioavailable by definition via IV, but plasma NAD+ showed NO measurable rise for roughly the first ~2 h of continuous infusion; by 6 h it was up ~398% (~400%) above baseline (Grant et al. 2019, PMID 31572171). [Verification: only 8 of the 11 men received NAD+ (3 were saline controls); the ~398% rise is the TREATED-group figure — do not read as '11 men infused'.] The retrospective comparison found IV NAD+ (500 mg in 500 mL saline) markedly less well tolerated than IV NR, with cramping/nausea/vomiting in all 6 recipients (resolving on completion). 5-Amino-1MQ: rat IV t½ 3.80±1.10 h (PMID 34304009); mouse IV (5 mg/kg) Cmax 2,009 ng/mL, AUC0-∞ 825 h·ng/mL, t½ 6.3 h (PMID 39161060). MOTS-c: no published IV PK.

Component-level, not blend-level — the completed human IV pilot is for intact NAD+ ALONE (not the combination), used a small sample (n=8 treated), and measured metabolome changes rather than any efficacy endpoint. No human dosing protocol is implied.

Intraperitoneal (IP)

Citedanimal invitro
Animal / in-vitro

Not a human route; a standard rodent-research route. MOTS-c is the component most studied via IP in mice — the foundational Lee et al. 2015 study (PMID 25738459) used IP dosing over 7–8 weeks to establish MOTS-c's effects on insulin resistance and diet-induced obesity; a later study (Kim et al. 2019) used 2.5 mg/kg IP twice daily for 3 days. Intact NAD+ itself is not typically IP-dosed; IP dosing of the NAD+ PRECURSOR NMN (not intact NAD+) is common in rodent aging studies. No IP data were found for 5-Amino-1MQ (its rodent PK used IV, oral, and SC only).

Bioavailability: Used as a laboratory dosing route in mouse efficacy/mechanistic studies rather than a dedicated PK characterization; bioavailability was not a reported endpoint. Not applicable to human use.

Component-level (MOTS-c primarily, the NAD+ precursor NMN secondarily), not blend-level. A laboratory-animal route cited only to describe how preclinical component research was conducted. No human dosing is implied.

4B · 10

Dosage reference & research tools

Dosage reference spectrum

UGC · disclaimedM4B
No data availableNo structured dosage-reference rows are on file yet.

Animal & human figures are kept visibly separate so studied animal doses are never misread as human guidance.

Reconstitution calculator

UGC · disclaimedM10
mg
mL
Concentration
5.00 mg/mL
For a 250 mcg reference unitdraw 0.050 mL= 5.0 units (U-100)
Reconstituted stability22 of 28 days left

Research unit-conversion only · not for human use

07 · 08 · 24 · 34 · 35 · 33

Vendors & price intelligence

United States

Vendor & price comparison

CitedM7 · M8

Sorted A–Z by vendor — never by price

Price / mg
$2.29
Vendors tracked
1
In stock
1
With COA
1

As of 2026-07-14· research-catalog listings, dated & cited — no ranking, no commission earned, never sorted by price. Research use only.

VendorFormat · sizePricePrice / mgCOAStockSource
NENextday Peptides
120 mgVial$275$2.292026-07-10

Crawled vendor listings, sorted A–Z by vendor — never by price.

Price-per-mg history

M8
No data availableNo price history is on file yet.

Price distribution

DerivedM8

Researched storefront prices, bucketed

Provisional · live crawl in progress
< $5
6 vendors
$5–6.9
0 vendors
$7–8.9
0 vendors
$9–10.9
0 vendors
≥ $11
0 vendors

p25 $0.830 · median $0.980 · p75 $1.21 · 9 researched vendors

Legit, COA-backed band: $0.375$1.24/mg.

Cross-region & vial-size economics

DerivedM8

Cross-region pricing

United States (researched)
$0.980/mg
Canada
Collecting
United Kingdom
Collecting
European Union
Collecting

Only the US market has been researched so far — no FX conversion is applied.

Vial-size economics

120 mg vial
9 vendors offer it

Bigger vials generally lower $/mg but raise reconstitution-waste risk.

Cost & value analytics

DerivedM24
Provisional · live crawl in progress
$0.375min /mg
$0.980median /mg
$2.50max /mg

Value rule: don't just buy the cheapest — a price under $3/mg is a red flag. Pair price with COA and independent-test grade.

Estimated cost of research (10 mg)

Vial (best researched price)
$4
Bacteriostatic water (generic estimate)
$6
Syringes / supplies (generic estimate)
$12

Vendor reliability

M34
No data availableOn-time / reship reliability metrics require the live crawl's fulfillment history, which is not collected yet.

Bulk / B2B procurement

M35
No data availableWholesale / vendor-direct pricing tiers are not researched yet.

Licensed clinics & 503A

CitedM33

Segregated from gray-market research vendors · shown only where lawful.

Opens as US reclassification formalizes
19 · 36 · 20 · 18 · 32

Quality, verification & alerts

Quality, testing & COA verification

CitedM19 · M36

What each test proves — general guidance, plus this compound's researched purity data

HPLC
Purity %
Mass spec (MS)
Identity — the only proof it is the right molecule
Potency / quantitation
Catches underdosing
Endotoxin (LAL)
EU/mg
Heavy metals
Contamination
Residual solvents
Process residue
Sterility / bioburden
Microbial
Lot / batch traceability
Provenance
Verify your vial's COA — paste a Janoshik task # to check authenticity & recency (< 6 mo).

Purity on the current market (researched)

Vendor COAs for the individual components (component-level, not blend-level — no independent lab publicly tests the pre-mixed three-ingredient blend as a unit) cluster ≥99% HPLC: MOTS-c — NGPeptide's Freedom-Diagnostics-tested batches range 99.04–99.86% HPLC across May–Jun 2026 lots (e.g. lot MS40-08, tested 2026-06-28, 99.86%); 5-Amino-1MQ — Chameleon Peptides' Janoshik-tested batch 5A1MQ-B001 at ≥99% HPLC. For the pre-mixed blend itself, MS Peptides' 120 mg vial cites "99%+ purity" with lab certificates labeled "JANO" (Jan 2025) and "FDM" (Feb 2026) referenced in product images, without a per-component purity breakdown. No independent cross-vendor purity aggregate (Finnrick-style) exists for the named blend or either small-peptide component.

Independent labs cited for this compound

Reference MS/HPLC data not on file yet.

Counterfeit & recall alerts

CitedM20

No FDA recall targets the '5-Amino-1MQ / MOTS-c / NAD+' blend, or research-chemical-market 5-Amino-1MQ or MOTS-c products, by name — none found. The one directly relevant action is GenoGenix LLC's Class I recall of compounded NAD+ Injection (elevated endotoxin, 3 ER visits, Oct 2025) — a licensed 503B compounding-pharmacy product sharing the blend's NAD+ ingredient, not the lyophilized RUO vial sold by peptide-blend vendors. Component-level, not blend-level.

Buyer red-flag checklist

  • No FDA-approved drug application exists for any of the three blend components (5-Amino-1MQ, MOTS-c, NAD+) or for the blend as a combined product.
  • 5-Amino-1MQ has not entered the FDA regulatory pathway at all — no IND, no registered ClinicalTrials.gov study, no 503A bulks-list status — unlike MOTS-c, which at least has a pending Jul 2026 PCAC review track.
  • MOTS-c was an FDA Category 2 'substance with safety concerns' (Sept 2023) citing impurity/API-characterization and immunogenicity risk; its nomination has since been withdrawn (absent from current Category 2) and 503A compounding eligibility remains pending the Jul 2026 PCAC review — neither state confers approval.
  • A licensed 503B compounding pharmacy's NAD+ injection (GenoGenix) triggered an FDA Class I recall (elevated endotoxin, 3 ER visits) and a Jan 2026 warning letter naming both NAD+ and 5-Amino-1MQ — evidence the same active substances carry real sterility/potency risk under lapsed quality control, even though the unregulated RUO research-chemical channel is a separate supply chain from that recalled product.
  • 5-Amino-1MQ is a small molecule comparatively easy to substitute with structurally similar quinolines; HPLC purity alone cannot rule out substitution — look for LC-MS identity confirmation, not an HPLC-purity-only COA.
  • No dedicated independent-lab purity/underdosing aggregate (Finnrick- or MZ-Biolabs-style) exists for this blend or any component — buyers rely entirely on individual vendor-supplied COAs, none of which test the pre-mixed vial as a combined unit.
  • General research-peptide-market red flags apply: price far below the vendor median, no third-party COA, a COA report/task ID that doesn't resolve in the lab's public database, or a lot number mismatched to the COA are documented patterns of underdosed/substituted product.

Manufacturing, grade & supply chain

CitedM18

GMP vs research-grade: the chemistry (SPPS + HPLC + MS) is identical — the difference is the quality system.

Underdosing / mislabeling: No independent-lab aggregate (Finnrick, Janoshik cross-vendor index, or an MZ-Biolabs-style investigation) quantifying underdosing/mislabeling prevalence for the blend, or for MOTS-c or 5-Amino-1MQ individually, was found. The one comparable independent multi-vendor investigation (MZ Biolabs via thepeptidelist.com, 2026) tested BPC-157, semaglutide, CJC-1295 no-DAC and GHK-Cu only — none of this blend's three components — so its failure rate cannot be extended here. A widely-repeated 'Janoshik 2024: 43% of peptides failed purity' figure circulates in secondary sources but could not be confirmed against a primary lab publication and is treated as UNVERIFIED (consistent with the same finding on the BPC-157/KLOW overlays). Community guidance treats price far below market and HPLC-only (no LC-MS identity) COAs as substitution-risk signals specific to 5-Amino-1MQ, but no measured prevalence figure exists for any of the three components.

Shipping, customs & landed cost

CitedM32
  • FDA Import Alert 66-41 ('Detention Without Physical Examination of Unapproved New Drugs Promoted In The U.S.') authorizes DWPE of the products/firms named on the alert's Red List (charge FD&C 801(a)(3)/505(a); no approved NDA). [Verification, REFUTED-as-stated → SCOPE-corrected: an exhaustive full-text search of the live alert finds NO occurrence of 5-Amino-1MQ, MOTS-c, or NAD+ — the alert does NOT list this blend or its components. The Red List does capture other research-peptide/supplement imports (e.g. undeclared ipamorelin, 'PURE NMN POWDER').] None of the three components carry an FDA-approved drug application, so imports COULD become subject to DWPE if a particular importer/product is placed on the Red List, but 'no NDA' is necessary-but-not-sufficient — the alert as written is not a per-blend detention status. A 'Research Use Only' label does not by itself create an import exemption.66-41
  • An RUO label is not an import exemption — CBP judges actual intended use.
  • Lyophilized powder is ambient-stable in transit; temperature control needed for > 7-day transit.
  • US-warehouse vendors dodge import scrutiny — they cost more but ship more reliably.
06 · 6A · 31 · 44

Regulatory & developments

United States

Regulatory status & timeline

CitedM6
2019-09-05
FDA proposed rule (Docket FDA-2018-N-4845; 84 FR 46688) evaluated nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) — this blend's NAD+ component — for the Section 503A bulks list and proposed NOT to include it, citing inadequate physical/chemical stability, insufficient nonclinical toxicity data, and no published studies supporting its nominated use. The proposed rule was NEVER finalized. Component-level — not a determination about the blend or about MOTS-c/5-Amino-1MQ. [FDA — Amendments to the List of Bulk Drug Substances (proposed rule, 84 FR 46688)]
2025-10-21
FDA classified a GenoGenix LLC (Boca Raton, FL) recall of NAD+ for Injection (100/200 mg/mL, Lot GG121624-023) as Class I (recall D-0094-2026) after elevated bacterial endotoxin; three patients reportedly went to the ER (low blood pressure, shaking, body aches) after administration. Recall initiated 2025-07-30. Component-level (NAD+ compounded product only); GenoGenix is a 503B compounding pharmacy, not a research-chemical vendor of this blend. [openFDA Drug Enforcement Database — recall D-0094-2026]
2026-01-20
FDA issued a Warning Letter (MARCS-CMS 718739) to GenoGenix LLC, a registered 503B outsourcing facility, stating the firm compounded drug products using bulk drug substances not eligible under section 503B — specifically 5-amino-1-methylquinolinium iodide (5-Amino-1MQ) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) — and describing the endotoxin-contaminated NAD+ product and three-patient adverse-event complaint. Component-level (5-Amino-1MQ, NAD+; MOTS-c not named) — no vendor of this research blend is implicated. [FDA — Warning Letter, GenoGenix LLC, MARCS-CMS 718739]
2026-04-16
FDA published a Federal Register notice (FR Doc 2026-07361; 91 FR 20465; Docket FDA-2025-N-6895) establishing a public docket and announcing a PCAC meeting to evaluate seven peptides — BPC-157, Emideltide, Epitalon, KPV, MOTS-c, Semax, and TB-500 — for inclusion on the Section 503A bulk drug substances list. MOTS-c is this blend's peptide component; 5-Amino-1MQ and NAD+ are NOT on this docket. [Federal Register — PCAC Notice of Meeting; Public Docket (FDA-2025-N-6895)]
2026-05-14Current
FDA's most-recently-updated '503A Categories' list still carries Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD) and NAD Disodium Reduced (NADH) — this blend's NAD+ component — under Category 1 ('Bulk Drug Substances Under Evaluation'), meaning FDA's 2019 proposal not to list NAD has not been finalized and 503A eligibility remains an open evaluation. MOTS-c is absent from current Category 2 (nomination withdrawn); a distinct substance, Beta-NAD Disodium Salt Trihydrate, sits in Category 2 but is not NAD/NADH. Component-level. [FDA — Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A]
2026-07-23Upcoming
FDA PCAC meets July 23–24 2026 at FDA White Oak to discuss MOTS-c (free base and acetate) — this blend's peptide component — among seven peptides reviewed for the Section 503A Bulks List; the FDA briefing document is titled 'FDA Briefing Document for MOTS-c-Related Bulk Drug Substances.' Public docket FDA-2025-N-6895 closes July 22 2026. An advisory-committee review, not a final action. Component-level (MOTS-c only); no docket item addresses 5-Amino-1MQ, NAD+, or the blend as sold. [FDA — Advisory Committee Calendar: July 23-24 2026 PCAC Meeting]

WADA anti-doping status

CitedWADA

The blend itself is not named on the WADA Prohibited List. Of its three components: MOTS-c ('mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA-c') IS explicitly named and prohibited AT ALL TIMES under the WADA 2026 Prohibited List section S4.4.1 (S4 Hormone and Metabolic Modulators — AMPK activators), alongside BAM15 and AICAR (a non-Specified substance) [Verification: confirmed verbatim via pdftotext of the official PDF — NOT S0 and NOT S2, contradicting vendor-blog lore]. 5-Amino-1MQ is NOT explicitly named anywhere in the 2026 List (direct text search: zero hits); as an unapproved investigational small molecule it would plausibly fall under the S0 (Non-Approved Substances) catch-all definition, but that is an INFERENCE, not a confirmed WADA determination — vendor blogs asserting an 'explicit S0 listing' are inaccurate on the word 'explicit'. NAD+ is NOT named on the List (an endogenous coenzyme; direct search: zero hits); however WADA Prohibited Method M2.2 (a Specified Method) bans IV infusions/injections exceeding 100 mL per 12 h except during hospital treatment, surgery, or clinical diagnostic investigations — relevant to NAD+ IV-drip administration, independent of NAD+'s own non-prohibited status (with the caveat that RUO/non-approved NAD+ material could also be argued under S0).

Source

Patent & IP landscape

CitedM31

No granted patents identified in current seed. Composition-of-matter coverage is limited given the peptide's synthetic origin.

Use-context & responsibility

CitedM44
  • IACUC / IRB research context
  • RUO buyer responsibilities & documentation
  • Veterinary / alternative-use where lawful
  • Jurisdiction-aware "who may lawfully obtain"
12 · 17 · 22 · 39 · 13 · 11 · 23

Community, sentiment & answers

FAQ

CitedM13

Community sentiment

UGC · disclaimedM22
Research-seeded estimate — the tone mix is manually researched; contribution counts are illustrative until the live pipeline arms.
Community signal · Layer BDivided receptionHow it's received in discussion — not whether it works.
directional
Positive 33%Neutral 39%Critical 28%

Based on 18 qualifying contributions across 1 platform, last 90 daysLimited signal

One platform only

Not enough history to show a trend yet.

What this is — and is not
Is

A read on how this compound is received in public discussion — the balance of positive, neutral and critical mentions over time.

Is not

Not a measure of whether it works, is safe, or is effective; not medical advice; the unverified opinions of anonymous community members (Layer B).

Community Sentiment — Layer B. This reflects the tone of public discussion across Reddit, Bluesky, YouTube and X over the last 90 days (as of 2026-07-13). It measures how a compound is discussed and received, not whether it is safe, effective, or appropriate for any use. It is not medical, dosing, or purchasing advice and is not an endorsement. Posts are aggregated and de-identified; individual comments, claims, and dosing discussion are never shown. Research use only.

Community themes & reported concerns

Research-seeded · not liveUGC · disclaimedM12 · M39

What people discuss

NAD+/peptide co-formulation chemical-stability debate (oxidation / denaturation risk)
85
Blend vs. separate-vial reconstitution — cost / storage-convenience tradeoff
70
Component mg-ratio critique (vendor-standard 10:1:1 vs. NAD+-heavier ratios such as 20:1:1)
60
Energy / fatigue framing in podcast and newsletter coverage
55
Stacking with other mitochondrial-support compounds (SS-31, SLU-PP-332, methylene blue)
50
Combined-dose magnitude discussion when components are stacked at full individual research doses
40
Nutrient-cofactor (CoQ10 / magnesium / carnitine) deficiency raised as an alternate fatigue explanation
35

Reported concerns — discussion, not established effects

Chemical/physical co-formulation compatibility concern (NAD+ potentially oxidizing/hydrolyzing the peptides; hydrophobic 5-Amino-1MQ carrier posing a denaturation risk to MOTS-c) reported in discussion
35%
Combined-dose magnitude viewed as excessive when MOTS-c and 5-Amino-1MQ are stacked at full individual research doses, reported in discussion
25%
NAD+ per-dose sufficiency doubted (100 mg viewed by some discussants as marginal), reported in discussion
20%
Paradoxical / persistent fatigue reported in discussion, most often attributed by discussants to an underlying nutrient-cofactor deficiency rather than to the blend itself
18%
Cardiovascular (heart-rate / palpitation) and GI discomfort reported in discussion of the MOTS-c component specifically — component-level, not blend-level
12%

Reading caveats

  • Textual discourse is concentrated in a single influencer newsletter (Derek Pruski's Substack) rather than distributed peer-to-peer threads — single-author framing risk
  • No confirmed reddit.com, X, or Bluesky threads found specifically discussing this named three-component blend despite repeated targeted searches; the aggregate sample spans peptide-research forums (GLP-1 Forum, Peptide Critic Community) outside the tracked platform set plus YouTube/podcast coverage — platform coverage is thin and may not generalize
  • Vendor product pages dominate top search results, crowding out independent commentary and making genuine community sentiment harder to isolate
  • Concurrent multi-peptide stacking (SS-31, SLU-PP-332, methylene blue) confounds attribution of any reported effect specifically to this blend
  • Recency bias — vendor listings and blog coverage for this named blend appear concentrated within roughly the last 12 months, so the sample is small and may not represent a mature market

Manually researched from youtube— theme weights are research estimates, not live counts; aggregated & de-identified. No individual posts, quotes, or usernames are ever shown.

41 · 21 · 42 · 28 · 27 · 26 · 29 · 43 · 14 · 16

Tools, market & meta

Research & market activity

M21

Relative research / market volume — populated once the activity stream is wired

No data availableA per-compound research and market activity stream is not collected yet.

Ask this datasheet

CitedM41
Grounded only in this compound's cited data · refuses dosing advice

Watch & listing momentum

M21
No data availableWatch and listing momentum derive from the vendor crawl, not yet wired for this compound.

Lifecycle & market history

M42
No data availableMarket lifecycle and price history are not collected for this compound yet.

Data confidence & contribute

CitedM28
VerifiedVendor-statedCommunityStale

Glossary & reading mode

CitedM27

Inline tooltips for lyophilized, RUO, EU/mg, SPPS, 503A and more.

Toggle plain-language ↔ scientific in the header.

Guides & explainers

CitedM26
  • How to read a COA
  • Free base vs acetate
  • Understanding evidence grades

Market intelligence

M43
No data availableCategory sizing and demand intelligence are not collected for this compound yet.

Citable summary (GEO)

DerivedM14

US regulatory status: Research use only. Research use only.

Emitted as JSON-LD: ChemicalSubstance · BreadcrumbList · FAQPage.

Save, track & alerts

CitedM16
  • Price-drop & back-in-stock alerts
  • Regulatory-change email digest
  • Print / share this datasheet

Export, citation & data

CitedM29
reviewed by the PeptideCompass editorial team